A claim on a label is a promise the FTC expects you to prove. Here is the evidence each one needs. "Dermatologist approved" is not on the list of things you can earn: no one approves cosmetics. "Dermatologist-tested" is, and it is the claim shoppers look for.
ClaimEvidence it needsCan you print it?
Dermatologist-testedHRIPT on a volunteer panel under dermatologist supervisionYes, with the report on file
HypoallergenicHRIPT with no sensitisation, plus a formula free of common allergensYes, worded carefully: the FDA has no legal definition
Non-comedogenicAn in-use comedogenicity study on acne-prone skinYes, with the study on file
Clinically tested, or '9 in 10 said…'A consumer perception or instrumental study with the exact statisticYes, the number must match the study
SPF 30, broad spectrum, water resistantIn vivo SPF, the broad-spectrum test and water-resistance immersionOnly as an OTC drug in the US: drug-registered facility, drug listing and the sunscreen rules
Dermatologist recommendedA documented survey of practising dermatologistsPossible, quoted on request
Dermatologist approvedNothing: no board or body approves cosmeticsDo not print it. Use dermatologist-tested
FDA approvedNothing: the FDA does not approve cosmeticsNever. It is a false claim